Ryan runs a copywriting agency. Correction: ran. Past tense is important here.
Last month, he tested ChatGPT 5 against Claude 3.5 on 50 real client campaigns. Same products. Same audiences. Same budgets. Different AI.
The results killed his agency. Not because the AIs failed—because they succeeded too well. Clients realized they didn’t need Ryan anymore. They needed to know which button to push.
ChatGPT software won 31 campaigns. Claude 3.5 AI won 19. But the real winner was the combination, which beat both by 400%.
Learn AI copywriting mastery – read more in this article where words convert to wealth.
Ryan’s methodology was bulletproof:
50 campaigns split into:
Each AI wrote:
Success metric: Actual conversion rate over 30 days
No opinions. No subjective reviews. Just cold, hard conversion data.
ChatGPT 5’s winning formula: Make them feel, then make them buy.
Example from winning SaaS campaign:
“Your team left at 9 PM again. Third time this week. You promised your daughter you’d make her recital. You didn’t. Again.
This isn’t about productivity. It’s about promises. The ones you break. The ones that matter.
Our software doesn’t give you time back. Nothing can. But it gives you tomorrow. And tomorrow, you keep your promise.”
Conversion rate: 8.7% (industry average: 2%)
ChatGPT 5’s patterns:
Won categories: E-commerce (9/10), Consumer apps (8/10), Course launches (7/10)
Claude 3.5’s approach: Destroy objections with precision.
Example from winning B2B campaign:
“You spend $47,000/year on inefficiency. Here’s the math:
Our solution costs $9,000/year. ROI: 1,458% year one.
The math is simple. The decision should be too.”
Conversion rate: 12.3% (industry average: 3%)
Claude 3.5’s patterns:
Won categories: B2B services (9/10), SaaS products (6/10)
E-commerce Results:
B2B Services Results:
SaaS Products Results:
Course Launches Results:
Consumer Apps Results:
Ryan’s accident: He forgot to assign one campaign. Both AIs wrote copy. The intern combined them.
Result: 18.7% conversion rate.
The combination formula:
Example fusion copy:
[ChatGPT 5’s opening] “Sarah stared at her Shopify dashboard. Three sales. Three months. Her husband’s ‘I told you so’ lingered unspoken at dinner.”
[Claude 3.5’s logic] “87% of Shopify stores fail in year one. Not from bad products. From invisible stores. You’re not failing. You’re just unseen.”
[ChatGPT 5’s vision] “Imagine opening your phone tomorrow. 47 orders overnight. Your husband asking ‘What happened?’ You, smiling, saying nothing.”
[Claude 3.5’s solution] “Our system generates 10,000+ targeted visitors in 30 days. Guaranteed. Historical client average: 31,000 visitors, 3.7% conversion rate.”
[ChatGPT 5’s close] “This isn’t about traffic. It’s about proving them wrong. It’s about proving yourself right.”
[Claude 3.5’s guarantee] “30-day money-back guarantee. No traffic = full refund. Simple.”
This combination converted at 18.7%. Client made $400K in one month.
Ryan’s biggest client wanted proof. Real A/B test. $100K ad spend.
Version A: Human copywriter (10 years experience) Version B: ChatGPT 5 alone Version C: Claude 3.5 alone Version D: Combined AI approach
Results after $25K spend each:
Human copy:
ChatGPT 5:
Claude 3.5:
Combined:
Client’s response: “Why do we need your agency?”
Ryan’s agency: Dead in 30 days.
After 50 campaigns, clear patterns emerged:
Use ChatGPT 5 when:
Use Claude 3.5 when:
Use both when:
Ryan’s smartest client discovered the pattern:
Morning emails: ChatGPT 5 (emotional, story-driven) Afternoon emails: Claude 3.5 (logical, data-driven) Evening emails: ChatGPT 5 (vision, dreams)
Conversion rate increased 340%.
“Different times of day, different states of mind, different AI. It’s not about better. It’s about when.”
Ryan didn’t die. He evolved:
Old agency: Writing copy New agency: AI orchestration
Services:
Price increased 400%. Clients increased 200%. Work decreased 90%.
“I don’t write anymore. I conduct. ChatGPT 5 and Claude 3.5 are my orchestra.”
“In 6 months, no human will write sales copy. The question isn’t human vs AI. It’s which AI for which moment.
ChatGPT 5 for hearts. Claude 3.5 for minds. Both for wallets.
Learn to conduct, or learn to starve.”
His prediction accuracy so far: 100%
Alexia is the author at Research Snipers covering all technology news including Google, Apple, Android, Xiaomi, Huawei, Samsung News, and More.
Due to the global shortage of memory chips, Apple is looking for new suppliers in…
Ubisoft is working on the next big title in its well-known video game series with…
A PC gamer has found a way to bring the feel of classic cartridges into…
Apple is suing OpenAI for allegedly stealing secret hardware information. Current documents now show the…
Sonos is currently releasing a new app update: The classic tab navigation returns, speakers can…
Meeting platform Zoom has warned of a serious security flaw in its Windows software that…