Home » Technology » Meta Problem: Zuckerberg’s course divides the workforce

Meta Problem: Zuckerberg’s course divides the workforce

Mark Zuckerberg’s recent decisions regarding (non-)moderation are causing uproar and threats of termination internally. Meta employees are protesting against new policies that allow anti-LGBTQ+ speech and other hate speech.

Revolt against Zuckerberg’s change of course

There is currently considerable turmoil at Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. The reason: new content moderation guidelines announced by CEO Mark Zuckerberg. These changes now allow users, among other things, to describe LGBTQ+ people as “mentally ill” – a decision that has been met with massive internal criticism.

The announcement came on Monday when Zuckerberg said the company wanted to “return to its roots of free expression.” Specifically, this means easing restrictions on issues such as immigration and gender identity. Particularly explosive: The new guidelines explicitly allow “claims about mental illness or abnormalities based on gender or sexual orientation.” How 404 Media reported, this decision led to heated internal discussions. Employees express their dismay and anger in threads on the company’s Workplace platform. An LGBTQ+ employee wrote something like:

I am LGBT and mentally ill. I just wanted to let you know that I will be taking some time off to look after my mental health.

Other comments range from incomprehension to open criticism of company management. Some employees are even considering leaving the company. “The mood among queer colleagues is at an all-time low,” one Meta employee told 404 Media.

Questionable decision-making process

What is particularly irritating for many employees is the lack of transparency in decision-making. Typically, such policy changes are discussed in detailed meetings and external experts are consulted. This time the trial appears to have taken place behind closed doors.

Experts see Zuckerberg’s move – not surprisingly – as having political motives. Sarah T. Roberts, a professor at UCLA, suspects that Meta is trying to get away with minimal content moderation. Some observers interpret the changes as an attempt to accommodate Donald Trump and conservative circles – especially after the 2024 US elections.

Zuckerberg’s reaction and outlook

On threads, Zuckerberg responded to the criticism: “Some people may leave our platforms because of virtue, but I think the vast majority and many new users will find that these changes improve the products.”

Leave a Reply