Home » Technology » The owner of Tesla’s car roof rights defender speaks again: Only one solution is received

The owner of Tesla’s car roof rights defender speaks again: Only one solution is received

The owner of Tesla's car roof rights defender speaks again: Only one solution is received-Tesla Tesla Electric Car-cnBeta.COM


In the midday news on January 3, Tesla’s car roof rights activist @锟斤A solution was to ask the insurance company to repair the car, and Tesla would sell it for her. Ms. Zhang said that Tao Lin’s “unreasonable demands” had been given up on March 6th. After that, her biggest demand was to hope that Tesla could provide complete data on the vehicle at the time of the incident. The following is the full text of Ms. Zhang’s Weibo: Related content of the reputation right case: On April 19th, Tesla’s vice president Tao Lin said in an interview, “We have proposed a lot of solutions. We definitely need to be recognized by customers, but if it is an unreasonable request, There is no way to satisfy her. She does not accept vehicle inspections and must insist on high compensation.

We have no reason to satisfy. I think she is very professional and there should be (person) behind her.” “We cannot agree to her request. , Her appeal is unreasonable, and she is unwilling to cooperate in the test. She is only willing to pay high compensation, and only accepts high compensation.” First, the truth is that she was engaged in the two long months before being sent to the Shanghai Auto Show. During the days of rights defense, after several times of mediation by the Market Supervision Bureau, Tesla only proposed a solution, which is to ask me to agree to the insurance company to repair the car, and Tesla will sell it for me. Sell ​​me a good price.

This kind of solution. From the beginning to the end, there are not many solutions that Ms. Tao Lin said, and she disagrees with this statement. Second, Tao Lin’s “unreasonable demands” have been mediated many times by the market supervision department after the incident. I have already given up on the appeal in the letter of appeal that the Tesla staff asked me to write on March 6th. After this, my only biggest appeal is to hope that Tesla can provide complete data of the vehicle at the time of the incident.

During the trial, I also asked the court to investigate and seek evidence from the market supervision department. At the same time, in accordance with Article 8 of the “Consumer Rights Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China,” consumers have the right to know the true status of the goods they purchase or use or the services they receive. “Civil Code Law of the People’s Republic of China” “Personal Data Information Security Protection Law” car owners can consult or copy their personal information to information processors in accordance with the law; the above laws and regulations are also sufficient to explain that consumers have the right to know their own vehicle data, in accordance with the above laws and regulations, I asked Tesla to provide data to find out the truth of the accident.

However, Ms. Tao Lin, vice president of Tesla, ignored my country’s laws and regulations. Said that there is no reason to be satisfied! And framed my request as unreasonable! Third, Ms. Tao Lin said that I was unwilling to cooperate with the test, and only accepted high compensation, very professional, because there should be someone behind it, and the negative news was all provided by me. It is nonsense. In fact, many Tesla accidents across the country have been reported by major official media before the auto show, including CCTV, Xinhua News Agency, People’s Daily, Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Nanchang, Wenzhou, etc. It is particularly noteworthy that the Hainan through train media reported on the incident of brake failure on March 11. The car owner can’t stop the car, and Tesla employees can’t stop the car even when they go to the scene to simulate the experiment. In this incident, without the consent of the owner, Tesla sent the vehicle to a third-party testing agency that did not have the qualifications for judicial authentication for testing and announced the front-wheel-drive version of the testing report.

As we all know, Tesla has never produced a precursor version of the MODEL3, etc. This obvious dumping behavior continues to arouse widespread heated discussion in society. These publicly reported negative news has nothing to do with me. Where is all the negative news provided by me? Tesla’s false remarks are nakedly infringing upon my reputation. Eight months have passed, and Ms. Tao Lin’s agent has still failed to show evidence of facts to the court in the public trial. On the contrary, Ms. Tao Lin’s agent claimed that Ms. Tao Lin’s behavior was official behavior. Does the act of Ms. Tao Lin publicly publishing false remarks to the media violate my personal reputation without any factual basis?