Home » Technology » Tesla’s brakes failed, female car owners exposed to more court hearings

Tesla’s brakes failed, female car owners exposed to more court hearings

Tesla Model 3


On December 24 last year, a female car owner on the roof of the Shanghai Auto Show Station sued Tesla and Tesla’s global vice president Tao Lin in a dispute over reputation rights, which was heard in the People’s Court of Beiguan District, Anyang City, Henan Province. And Tesla counterclaimed the female car owner in August last year, demanding compensation of 5 million yuan from the female car owner for loss of reputation. In this context, the female car owner’s request for compensation for mental damage was increased from 50,000 yuan to 500,000 yuan in China. On that day, the trial did not pronounce a verdict.

On January 2nd, Tesla’s female rights defending car owner revealed more about the content of the trial of the “honor rights case” on the online platform. The female car owner said: On April 19th, Tesla’s vice president Tao Lin said in an interview, “We have put forward a lot of solutions. We definitely need to be approved by customers, but if it is an unreasonable request, we have no way to go. satisfy. She does not accept vehicle inspections and must insist on high compensation. We have no reason to satisfy. I think she is very professional and there should be (people) behind her.

“It is impossible for us to agree to her request. Her request is unreasonable, and she is unwilling to cooperate in the test. She is only willing to pay high compensation and only accepts high compensation.” First, the truth of the matter is that During the long two-month period of rights protection before the Shanghai Auto Show, it has undergone several mediations by the Market Supervision Bureau before and after.

Tesla only proposed one solution, which is to ask me to agree to the insurance company to repair the car. Tesla will sell it for me and sell it for a good price. This kind of solution, from the beginning to the end, did not exist many solutions that Ms. Tao Lin said, and she did not agree with this statement. 2. After the incident, Tao Lin’s “unreasonable demands” have been mediated by the market supervision department many times. I have already given up on the demands in the letter of appeal that the Tesla staff asked me to write on March 6.

After this, my only biggest appeal is to hope that Tesla can provide complete data of the vehicle at the time of the incident. During the trial, I also asked the court to investigate and seek evidence from the market supervision department. At the same time, in accordance with Article 8 of the “Consumer Rights Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China,” consumers have the right to know the true status of the goods they purchase or use or the services they receive. “Civil Code Law of the People’s Republic of China” “Personal Data Information Security Protection Law” car owners can consult or copy their personal information to information processors in accordance with the law; the above laws and regulations are also sufficient to explain that consumers have the right to know their own vehicle data, in accordance with the above laws and regulations, I asked Tesla to provide data to find out the truth of the accident.

However, Ms. Tao Lin, vice president of Tesla, ignored my country’s laws and regulations, saying that there was no reason to be satisfied! And framed my request as unreasonable! Third, Ms. Tao Lin said that I was unwilling to cooperate with the test, and only accepted high compensation, very professional, because there should be someone behind it, and the negative news was all provided by me. It is nonsense. In fact, many Tesla accidents across the country have been reported by major official media before the auto show, including CCTV, Xinhua News Agency, People’s Daily, Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Nanchang, Wenzhou, etc. It is particularly noteworthy that the Hainan through train media reported on the incident of brake failure on March 11.

The car owner could not stop the car, and Tesla employees could not stop the car when they went to the scene to simulate the experiment. In this incident, Without the consent of the owner, Tesla sent the vehicle to a third-party testing agency that did not have the qualifications for judicial authentication for testing and announced the front-wheel-drive version of the testing report. As we all know, Tesla has never produced a precursor version of the Model 3, etc. This obvious dumping behavior continues to arouse widespread heated discussion in society. None of the publicly reported negative news has anything to do with me. How come all the negative news is provided by me? Tesla’s false remarks are nakedly infringing upon my reputation. Eight months have passed, and Ms. Tao Lin’s agent has still failed to show evidence of facts to the court in the public trial. On the contrary, Ms. Tao Lin’s agent claimed that Ms. Tao Lin’s behavior was official behavior. Does the act of Ms. Tao Lin publicly publishing false remarks to the media violate my personal reputation without any factual basis?


Brain Curry

Brian is the news author at Research Snipers which mainly covers Technology News, Microsoft News, Google News, Facebook, Apple, Huawei, Xiaomi, and other tech news.